A growing number of states and federal lawmakers are pushing flat annual fees of $200 to $250 on electric vehicles, amounts that charge EV owners two to three times more than what the average gas car driver pays in federal fuel tax. The proposals are being framed as a way to fund road infrastructure, but the math doesn’t add up.
At a time when EVs represent roughly 10% of new car sales in the US and deliver billions in health, environmental, and energy security benefits, these blanket fees are a punitive approach that discourages adoption rather than fairly distributing road costs.
The math: EV owners would overpay
The federal gas tax has been stuck at 18.4 cents per gallon since 1993. Based on the average American driving 11,484 miles per year at 22.3 mpg, a typical gas car driver pays roughly $95 per year in federal gas tax. That’s it.
Yet the proposed federal EV fee, introduced by House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Sam Graves (R-MO), would hit EV owners with $200 per year, more than double what gas car drivers contribute to federal road funding. An earlier version of the proposal pushed that figure to $250, and many states are already charging EV owners at that level or higher.
As we reported last year, Republicans proposed taxing EVs at roughly 10 times the rate of gas cars when you account for the per-mile equivalent. A $200 annual fee is equivalent to the federal gas tax on about 1,087 gallons of gasoline — enough to drive over 100,000 miles in an average gas car. No EV or gas car owner is driving 100,000 miles a year.
The fundamental problem: these are flat fees that bear no relation to actual road usage. A grandmother driving her EV 3,000 miles a year pays the same as someone commuting 25,000 miles. Gas taxes, for all their flaws, at least scale with how much you drive. Flat EV fees don’t.
States are piling on
The federal proposal is just one layer. Currently, 36 states impose EV registration fees that result in EV drivers paying more annually than gas car drivers contribute through fuel taxes, according to data from the Atlas EV Hub.
Some states have gotten particularly aggressive. Texas charges a $400 initial registration fee plus $200 annually. New Jersey approved the nation’s highest EV fee at $250, rising $10 per year until it caps at $290 in 2028 — meaning new EV buyers face over $1,000 in upfront registration costs. Georgia charges $210.87 annually while the average gas driver there pays about $152 in state fuel tax.
Pennsylvania started collecting a $250 EV fee in 2026. Minnesota doubled its EV registration surcharges this year. The trend is accelerating, not slowing.
A fair alternative exists — per-mile charging
Oregon is one of the few states that has implemented a sensible alternative. Its OReGO program charges EV drivers 2.3 cents per mile, directly proportional to road usage — just like gas taxes. Utah and Hawaii have adopted similar per-mile models.
Per-mile charging is the obvious fair solution. It treats every driver equally regardless of fuel type, scales with actual road usage, and doesn’t create a perverse penalty for choosing a cleaner vehicle. If the goal is genuinely about road funding, per-mile fees are the answer. Flat fees reveal a different motivation.
The real problem: Congress won’t raise the gas tax
The federal gas tax hasn’t increased in 32 years. Adjusted for inflation, its purchasing power has been cut in half. That’s the core of the Highway Trust Fund shortfall — not the 4 million EVs on US roads (roughly 1.4% of the total vehicle fleet).
A single penny increase to the federal gas tax would generate twice the revenue of the proposed $200 EV fee. But raising the gas tax requires political courage, it affects 280 million registered vehicles. Singling out 4 million EV owners is the path of least resistance.
It’s worth noting that Sam Graves, the chairman who proposed the EV fee, has received $163,300 from the oil and gas industry, according to OpenSecrets data. The fossil fuel lobby has every incentive to make EV ownership more expensive and less attractive.
It’s too early for this — EVs still need momentum
The US lags far behind global EV adoption. While EVs made up 25% of global car sales in 2025, the US sat at just 10%. China is approaching peak oil demand. Vietnam hit 38% EV sales share. The EU reached 26%. The US is falling behind, and proposals like these push it further back.
Meanwhile, the Big Beautiful Bill already killed the $7,500 EV tax credit as of September 2025. The 30C charging infrastructure credit is being phased out. And now lawmakers want to add $200-$250 in annual fees on top.
The cumulative message is clear: the US government is actively discouraging EV adoption at the exact moment it should be accelerating it.
The benefits the US is leaving on the table
The economic case for EVs extends far beyond fuel savings. Research published in Nature found that large-scale EV adoption in the US could deliver $84 billion to $188 billion in health benefits by 2050 through reduced air pollution. Vehicle-related air pollution currently causes nearly 20,000 premature deaths annually in the US.
On energy security, EVs displaced 2.3 million barrels of oil per day globally in 2025 — equivalent to 70% of Iran’s exports. As we wrote just last week, EVs are the number one route to energy independence, reducing vulnerability to oil price spikes driven by geopolitical crises. More than half of global oil consumption powers personal vehicles. Every EV sold chips away at that dependence.
The US would save billions annually in reduced oil imports, healthcare costs, and climate damage by accelerating EV adoption. Instead, it’s choosing to tax it.
Electrek’s Take
The road funding argument for EV fees isn’t inherently unreasonable; EV owners do use roads and should contribute to their maintenance. But the execution is terrible. Flat fees of $200-$250 that charge EV owners double or triple what gas car drivers pay in federal tax aren’t about fairness. They’re about making EVs less attractive, whether intentionally or through lazy policymaking.
If Congress genuinely cared about road funding equity, it would implement per-mile charges that treat all drivers the same regardless of fuel type. Oregon has proven this works. Instead, lawmakers are choosing the blunt instrument of flat fees because it’s politically easier than raising the gas tax on 280 million vehicles, a tax that hasn’t budged in 32 years.
The timing makes it even worse. The US just killed EV tax credits, is phasing out charging infrastructure incentives, and now wants to add annual penalties on EV ownership. EVs represent 10% of new car sales and 1.4% of total vehicles on the road. The health, environmental, and energy independence benefits of EV adoption are worth tens of billions to the US economy. This is the moment to encourage the transition, not tax it into submission.
We need a serious conversation about road funding in the age of electrification. Flat EV fees aren’t a serious answer, they’re a political shortcut that punishes early adopters and slows down a transition the country desperately needs.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
